题目 |
期刊 |
文章 |
证券民事诉讼制度实施效果的实证研究——以虚假陈述案件为例 |
《证券市场导报》,2017年第4期 |
证券民事诉讼制度实施效果的实证研究——以虚假陈述案件为例》,《证券市场导报 |
中美证券法公共执行机制比较研究——基于监管机构投入产出的实证分析 |
《财经法学》,2017年第3期 |
中美证券法公共执行机制比较研究——基于监管机构投入产出的实证分析 |
《证券民事诉讼与投资者赔偿——基于虚假陈述案件的实证分析》 |
《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2017年第3期 |
《证券民事诉讼与投资者赔偿——基于虚假陈述案件的实证分析》 |
证券民事诉讼制度的实证研究 |
《中国政法大学学报》,2017年第2期 |
证券民事诉讼制度的实证研究 |
An Empirical Analysis of the Public Enforcement of Securities Law in China: Finding the Missing Piece to the Puzzle |
European Business Organization Law Review 18(2), forthcoming |
An Empirical Analysis of the Public Enforcement of Securities Law in China: Finding the Missing Piece to the Puzzle |
Truth and Robustness in Cross-Country Law and Finance Regressions: A Bayesian Analysis of Empirical “Law Matters”Thesis |
Journal of Applied Finance & BankingVol 6(6).2016. |
Truth and Robustness in Cross-Country Law and Finance Regressions: A Bayesian Analysis of Empirical “Law Matters” Thesis |
Reforming Private Securities Litigation in China: The Stock Market Has Already Cast Its Vote |
International Review of Law and Economics 45: 23-32. |
Reforming Private Securities Litigation in China: The Stock Market Has Already Cast Its Vote |
Law Matters?: A Bayesian Analysis of the Cross-Country Relationship Between Anti-Self-Dealing Rules and Stock Market Outcomes |
Applied Economics Letters 21: 366-371. |
Law Matters?: A Bayesian Analysis of the Cross-Country Relationship Between Anti-Self-Dealing Rules and Stock Market Outcomes |